Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  408 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 408 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S404

25th European congress of psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S365–S404

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.477

EW0864

Suicide-related Internet use among

university students

V. Voros

, P. O

svath , Z. Szabo , Z. Nagy , S. Fekete

University of Pecs, Department of Psychiatry, Pecs, Hungary

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Nowadays, mobile and Internet communication is

widely used and has a special role in mental health prevention.

Besides, websites targeting suicide prevention, pro-suicide con-

tents (methods for suicide, suicide pacts) are also easily available,

which may increase the risk for suicide in vulnerable people.

Aims

Our aim was to assess the relation between Internet use

and suicidal behaviour among university students and also to

assess online activity regarding suicidal contents and help-seeking

behaviour.

Methods

Self-administered questionnaires were completed by

university students.

Results

Most of the 101 students who completed the survey use

the Internet 3 hours or more a day. They are facing suicidal contents

numerous times. Professional websites providing information and

the common popular sites were mainly visited, sites providing help

were less screened (10%). More than quarter of the students felt

discomfort when looking at sites dealing with suicide. Almost one-

third of the subjects had suicidal thoughts during their lives and 15%

already planned suicide. In case of suicidal thoughts, subjectswould

seek help mainly from friends and family, but online help-seeking

was not preferred.

Conclusions

Despite of the extensive Internet use, students rarely

seek help for emotional problems on the Internet. Development

of websites controlled by professionals is essential, especially

for those who would not benefit from traditional psycholog-

ical/psychiatric care. Future research is needed regarding the

characteristics of Internet use and the potentials and limits of help-

seeking via the Internet in order to prevent people frompro-suicide

websites and to improve professional websites.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.478

EW0865

Differential diagnostic of

self-destructive behaviour via

structural-dynamic model

G. Pyliagina

Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education,

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology,

Kyiv, Ukraine

Objectives

Structural-dynamic model (SDM) of self-destructive

behaviour (SdB) is needed for differential diagnostic of numer-

ous features of SdB. SDM is based on an awareness that

self-destructiveness has different variants with diversity of

psychophysical damage as its outcome. SDM describes whole con-

tinuum of SdB variations and helps to differentiate them, to assess

risk of suicidal or non-suicidal activity and to do long-term prog-

nosis for SdB development as well.

Methods

SDMof SdB is a generalized conception, which is a result

of consequent scientific researches. The clinical criteria by ICD-10

and semi-structured suicidological interviewwere used in all of the

surveys. In general, we observed 860 patientswith suicidal attempt,

suicidal ideas and self-destructive injuries.

Results

Our researches proved that SDM of SdB determine sui-

cidological diagnosis implementing all-round assessment of SdB

features of patient using kinds, forms and clinical-pathogenetic

types as main categories of this concept. The kinds of SdB are:

self-aggressive behaviour, self-destructive behaviour (it includes

non-suicidal or psychotic variants) and suicidal behaviour. Each

kind of SdB helps to detect pathogenetic mechanisms and dynamic

tendencies in development of it. The form of SdB discloses

behavioural specification in each case. There are equivalent, inter-

nal and external forms. The clinical-pathogenetic types of SdB are:

suicidal, parasuicidal, pseudosuicidal or asuicidal. Each of themdis-

closes significant clinical characteristics of actual self-destructive

episode (nosology, syndrome, psychological traits, situation

peculiarities, etc.). The differential diagnostic of SdB by SDM con-

cept will allow doctors to treat patients more accurately and

effectively.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.489