data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39547/3954718aa54adec6b27e289bea6b57f9224c94f0" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/328f6/328f6812f3db399fe07c414a446d4e4899b0ed9b" alt="Page Background"
S404
25th European congress of psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S365–S404
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.477EW0864
Suicide-related Internet use among
university students
V. Voros
∗
, P. Osvath , Z. Szabo , Z. Nagy , S. Fekete
University of Pecs, Department of Psychiatry, Pecs, Hungary
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
Nowadays, mobile and Internet communication is
widely used and has a special role in mental health prevention.
Besides, websites targeting suicide prevention, pro-suicide con-
tents (methods for suicide, suicide pacts) are also easily available,
which may increase the risk for suicide in vulnerable people.
Aims
Our aim was to assess the relation between Internet use
and suicidal behaviour among university students and also to
assess online activity regarding suicidal contents and help-seeking
behaviour.
Methods
Self-administered questionnaires were completed by
university students.
Results
Most of the 101 students who completed the survey use
the Internet 3 hours or more a day. They are facing suicidal contents
numerous times. Professional websites providing information and
the common popular sites were mainly visited, sites providing help
were less screened (10%). More than quarter of the students felt
discomfort when looking at sites dealing with suicide. Almost one-
third of the subjects had suicidal thoughts during their lives and 15%
already planned suicide. In case of suicidal thoughts, subjectswould
seek help mainly from friends and family, but online help-seeking
was not preferred.
Conclusions
Despite of the extensive Internet use, students rarely
seek help for emotional problems on the Internet. Development
of websites controlled by professionals is essential, especially
for those who would not benefit from traditional psycholog-
ical/psychiatric care. Future research is needed regarding the
characteristics of Internet use and the potentials and limits of help-
seeking via the Internet in order to prevent people frompro-suicide
websites and to improve professional websites.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.478EW0865
Differential diagnostic of
self-destructive behaviour via
structural-dynamic model
G. Pyliagina
Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education,
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology,
Kyiv, Ukraine
Objectives
Structural-dynamic model (SDM) of self-destructive
behaviour (SdB) is needed for differential diagnostic of numer-
ous features of SdB. SDM is based on an awareness that
self-destructiveness has different variants with diversity of
psychophysical damage as its outcome. SDM describes whole con-
tinuum of SdB variations and helps to differentiate them, to assess
risk of suicidal or non-suicidal activity and to do long-term prog-
nosis for SdB development as well.
Methods
SDMof SdB is a generalized conception, which is a result
of consequent scientific researches. The clinical criteria by ICD-10
and semi-structured suicidological interviewwere used in all of the
surveys. In general, we observed 860 patientswith suicidal attempt,
suicidal ideas and self-destructive injuries.
Results
Our researches proved that SDM of SdB determine sui-
cidological diagnosis implementing all-round assessment of SdB
features of patient using kinds, forms and clinical-pathogenetic
types as main categories of this concept. The kinds of SdB are:
self-aggressive behaviour, self-destructive behaviour (it includes
non-suicidal or psychotic variants) and suicidal behaviour. Each
kind of SdB helps to detect pathogenetic mechanisms and dynamic
tendencies in development of it. The form of SdB discloses
behavioural specification in each case. There are equivalent, inter-
nal and external forms. The clinical-pathogenetic types of SdB are:
suicidal, parasuicidal, pseudosuicidal or asuicidal. Each of themdis-
closes significant clinical characteristics of actual self-destructive
episode (nosology, syndrome, psychological traits, situation
peculiarities, etc.). The differential diagnostic of SdB by SDM con-
cept will allow doctors to treat patients more accurately and
effectively.
Disclosure of interest
The author has not supplied his/her decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.489