Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  709 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 709 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S645–S709

S705

important in maintaining healthy habits and lifestyle in line with

what is taught in a nursing degree.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1253

EV0924

Integrated identification of new

substantional gadget addiction: With

selfie-mania phenomenon model

I. Sosin

1 ,

, Y . C

huev

2 , O.

Goncharova

2

1

Kharkov medical academy of postgraduate education, Narcology,

Kharkov, Ukraine

2

Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Narcology,

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Modern selfie-infatuation extent went far beyond

fashion and subculture causing distinct tendency to non-chemical

addiction state transformation requiring evidential scientific iden-

tification.

Aims and objectives

To develop clinical-psychological and clas-

sification basis for new type of gadget addiction (selfie-mania),

prevention and approaches tomental correction and rehabilitation.

Method

Selfie attitude testing of 157 respondents-students, and

internet resources topical data analysis were done.

Results

Behaviour models were rubricated, design and con-

tent, causes, clinical-psychological description, selfie-phenomenon

prevalence were clarified. It allows to state selfie-addiction spe-

cific key symptoms, conforming to ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for

addiction states:

– psychological and emotional supercomfort feeling during real-

izing selfie-interventions (substantional analogue of euphoria

phenomenon caused by psychoactive substances in narcology);

– desire for permanent updating and layouting in social networks

selfie-portraits, selfie-positions (impulse control disorder ana-

logue);

– selfie-modifying need causing adrenaline extreme and life threat

(analogues: compulsive craving, megadoses, overdosages, amne-

sias);

– obsessive craving to increase daily number of selfie-shots (toler-

ance syndrome analogue);

– constant foreshortening change of selfie-interventions (analogue:

experimentationwith different psychoactive substances, searching

behaviour);

– selfie-destruction psychopathological consequences (neurotism,

mental and behavioural disorders, group pattern of behavioural

selfie-deviations);

– formation of associated comorbid chemical and other substan-

tional addiction forms;

– selfie-deprivation syndrome (analogue: alcohol or drug with-

drawal syndrome);

– interdisciplinary range of problems (professional sphere of study

for sociologists, psychologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, narcolo-

gists, psychotherapists, sexopathologists, lawyers).

Conclusions

Selfie-addiction problem recognition is necessary on

the level of inclusion to ICD, that will allow to develop scientific,

legal and clinical base for integrated prevention, rehabilitation and

treatment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1254

EV0925

Selfie as a method of perception of the

virtual environment

M. Sulaimanova

1

, R. Sulaimanov

2 ,

1

Kyrgyz-Slavic University, Medical Psychology- Psychiatry- and

Psychotherapy, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

2

Osnabrück University, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück,

Germany

Corresponding author.

Nowadays selfie is one of the significant communication methods

in the conditions of the developing internet space.

Goal

The study of psychological mechanisms motivating percep-

tion of internet space via selfie.

Objectives

The identification of:

– The personal-social necessity in selfie, as a method of the virtual

world perception;

– The factors of personal-social necessity of the virtual communi-

cation via selfie;

– The personal features, which contribute to self-presentation in

virtual space via selfie.

Research methods

One hundred and thirty-four respon-

dents aging between16–28 (1

st

group: 68 respondents fond of

selfie(50.8%), 2

nd

group: 66 respondents not fond of selfie(49.2%))

were studied using standardized scales of anxiety (Spilberger-

Hanin), depression (Zung), ego-defense mechanisms(EGMs)-

(Plutchik-Kellerman-Konte), and life quality(WHO, 1991).

Results

Desire of high evaluation dominates in 47.8% of respon-

dents(r = 0.3;

P <

0.01). Fifty point seven percent of the 1

st

group

and13.4% in 2

nd

group have heightened anxiety (

r

= 0.3;

P <

0.01).

Forty-three point two percent in1

st

group and 23.9% in 2

nd

group

don’t have depression.

Subdepressive level dominates in 19,4% of 2

nd

group(

r

= 0.36;

P <

0.01), against 11.9% of 1

st

group.

In 1

st

group dominate: denial (17.9%), projection (16.4%), regression

(7.5%); in 2

nd

group: denial(17.9%), intellectualization(13.4%), pro-

jection(7.5%)(

P <

0.05). Forty-four point eight percent in 1

st

group

and 40.3% in 2

nd

group have a high level of EGM stress (

P <

0.05).

Forty-six point eight percent in 1

st

group have high level of subjec-

tive life quality, 0% had low one; in 2

nd

group: 26.9% have high level,

13.4% low one.

Conclusions

Personal-social necessity of virtual space percep-

tion via selfie reflects the severity of narcissistic tendencies. Selfie

in conditions of illusory reality increases the subjective level of

life quality. Isolation of narcissistic personality from communi-

cation through selfie suggests subjective decrease of life quality.

Effects of the selfie should be considered in the development of

rational methods of use of internet-technologies and in the psycho-

correction of people with low life quality.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1255

EV0926

Cross-national trainee

collaboration-The EFPT research

experience in psychiatry

S. Tomori

1 ,

, T. Mogren

2

, M. Asztalos

3

, G. Sampognia

4

,

M. Borovcanin

5

, G. Erzin

6

, J. Veiera

7

, R. Tipa

8

, A. Gurcan

9

,

S. Naughton

10

, E.F.O.P.T. EFP

T 11

1

University Hospital Center “Mother Teresa”, Pediatric Service,

Tirana, Albania

2

Allmänpsykiatriska kliniken Falun/Säter, Allmänpsykiatriska

kliniken Falun/Säter, Säter, Sweden

3

Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark

4

University of Naples SUN, Department of Psychiatry, Naple, Italy