Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  776 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 776 / 916 Next Page
Page Background European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S772–S846

Available online at

ScienceDirect

www.sciencedirect.com

25th European Congress of Psychiatry

ePoster viewing part 7

e-Poster Viewing: Psychotherapy

EV1127

Cultural reflections in practicing

exposure therapy for social anxiety

R. Aly

Egyptian Association of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Cairo, Egypt

Evidence-based practice of exposure therapy has long been

adopted as an effective therapy for treating anxiety disorders

including social anxiety. In many situations, it is the chosen ther-

apy for such a debilitating disease. Due to its proven efficacy

and readiness applicability, it has proven to be the 1st choice of

therapy for social anxiety across different life spans from ado-

lescents to geriatrics. Yet, cross-cultural differences have seldom

been considered in the approach towards managing social anx-

iety. Many differences lie between populations and countries in

defining what is accepted and what is not with regard to social

interactions. Even across the one country, many differences may

color the perception of appropriate social communication. Hence,

no one-size-fits all can be adopted here. Some interactions are

accepted and encouraged while others are basically banned. Thus,

during the application of exposure therapy, therapists shouldmod-

ify the conceptual framework while still trying to abide with the

fundamental notion of therapy of exposure experiments. In doing

this, many therapists may be challenged in their work. While

still lacking a strong body of research, clinical experience can

provide us with some helpful innovations for successful practice.

Our aim is to provide therapists and psychiatrists across the Arab

world with tools for applying successful therapy for social anxiety.

A series of case studies are discussed to present some innova-

tions in applying Cognitive Behavior Therapy for patients suffering

from social inhibitions. Moreover, essentials of past research are

reviewed and needs for further research directions in the field are

discussed.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1457

EV1128

Therapeutic approach to complicated

grief–An example of group

psychotherapy in psychiatric patients

J. Soares

1

, S.L. Azevedo Pinto

1 ,

, A.C. Pinheiro

2

, S. Pacheco

3

,

R. Curral

1

1

Hospital de S. João, Clínica de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental, Porto,

Portugal

2

Instituto Universitário de Ciências de Saúde, Ciências Sociais e do

Comportamento, Paredes, Portugal

3

Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educac¸ ão da Universidade do

Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educac¸ ão da

Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Complicated Grief (CG) affects 7–10% of the griev-

ing individuals in the general population. However, the incidence

is much higher in psychiatric patients, reaching 70% in most sam-

ples. These individuals present many risk factors for such condition,

demanding a particular attention and treatment approach. Most

studies have shown that pharmacological treatment may help

relieving depressive and anxiety symptoms, although they do

not promote a consistent improvement of the grieving scenario.

Several meta-analyses have recognized different psychological

interventions as effective in dealing with the loss, decreasing

psychological suffering and promoting adaptation. It is accepted

that the benefits of the intervention overcome any possible

harm.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of a group intervention (12

sessions) in pharmacologically stabilized psychiatric patients pre-

senting with CG.

Methods

Patient selection was performed through a clinical

interview and the fulfilment of the following psychometric tests:

Complicated Grief Inventory; the Impact of Events Scale; Beck

Depression Inventory; Social Support Scale. These assessment tools

were also used to evaluate the impact of the intervention per-

formed.

Results

After the psychotherapeutic intervention, therewere sig-

nificant differences in the levels of depressive and post-traumatic

stress symptoms.

0924-9338/