Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  877 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 877 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S847–S910

S873

the patient and control groups. NLR and CRP were not significantly

correlated with API scores.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NLR is elevated in patients

with substance use disorders in comparison to healthy controls.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1754

EV1425

Retrospective analysis of a novel

community opiate detoxification

programme within Bristol specialist

drug & alcohol service (BSDAS)

L. Paklet

, I. Radu , B. Watson

Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, BSDAS,

Bristol, United Kingdom

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Until recently community opiate detoxification

strategies have largely been limited to gradual dose reductions in

opiate substitute treatment (OST). These detoxes are often lengthy

leading to “windows of opportunities” in patients’ motivation to

detox being missed. Furthermore, many patients remain on sub-

optimal OST doses for long periods of time, during which they are

more vulnerable to relapse to illicit opiate use.

Within our community service, we adapted and implemented

a novel two-week community opiate detoxification programme

using buprenorphine front-loading and lofexidine. We worked in

partnership with Bristol drugs project (BDP) to offer an 8-week

psychosocial intervention alongside the medically assisted detoxi-

fication.

Objectives

Assessing the completion rates and clinical safety of

this intervention.

Methods

Data collection was performed through retrospective

review of patients’ case notes over a 9-month period.

Results

Seventy-five percent of the patients starting an opiate

detox successfully completed the intervention.

Lofexidine improved the mean opiate withdrawal scores by 28% at

45min after the first dose and this was a sustained effect through-

out the detox. Mean systolic blood pressure dropped by 6.2mmHg

at 45min after the first dose of lofexidine and by 16.5mmHg two

days later however this was asymptomatic in all patients. There

was no significant change in the heart rate and no adverse events.

Conclusion

Our team innovatively adapted and tailored a cost-

effective community opiate detoxification programme using a

multi-agency strategy in a climate of limited funding and staff

resources. Our data clearly indicates positive outcomes in terms

of completion rates and clinical safety.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1755

EV1426

Nalmefene effectiveness in reducing

alcohol consumption and prevention

of craving: A case report

G. Pardo de Santayana

1 ,

, R . L

andera

1 , M.

Juncal

1 , O.

Porta

1 ,

L. Sánchez

1 , M.

Gómez

2 , N.

Nuria

2

1

Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Psychiatry,

Santander, Spain

2

Hospital Universitario Alava-Sede Santiago, Psychiatry,

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Alcohol use disorder is a pressing problem in our

society. However, only a small percentage of patients with alco-

hol use disorder are ever treated. Nalmefene acts as an antagonist

of mu opioid receptors preventing the pleasurable sensation that

often accompanies alcohol consumption, while its modulation of

kappa opioid receptors can decrease the dysphoria associated with

alcohol withdrawal.

Aim

Studying the effect of nalmefene on patients with alcohol

use disorder who are trying to reduce their daily alcohol consump-

tion.

Methods

This is a descriptive study that pretends to assess the

effect of nalmefene 18mg/day on alcohol intake in a sample of five

patients (3 men and 2 women) that came to our psychiatric con-

sultation from March to September 2016. They all had tried in the

past to stop or reduce their alcohol consumption but were unable

to do so. We initiate follow-up with the patients in psychiatric

consultation for the next three months with a monthly frequency.

Results

Out of the 5 patients, 4 reported to have reduced their

alcohol consumption over the observation time, going from 32

drinks per week to 18 drinks per week on average. The fifth patient

abandoned prematurely the treatment due to the appearance of

side effects (nausea). No other relevant side effects were detected.

Conclusions

Nalmefene appears to be effective and safe reducing

abusive alcohol intake and avoiding alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

Therefore, nalmefene can be considered a good therapeutic option

helping reduce alcohol consumption in patients with alcohol use

disorder.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1756

EV1427

The effectiveness of case management

interventions for patients suffering

from substance use disorders

L. Penzenstadler

1 ,

, A. Machado

1

, Y. Khazaal

1 , 2

1

Geneva University Hospitals, Addictology, Geneva, Switzerland

2

Geneva University, Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Substance use disorder (SUD) is a growing health

problem which needs a very complex range of care due to the

chronic and relapsing nature of the disorder and the multiple psy-

chosocial problems involved. There are often difficulties in current

outpatient programs to deliver and coordinate ongoing care and

access to different health care providers. To improve treatment

outcomes various case management (CM) models have been devel-

oped, at first in other psychiatric domains but also for patients with

SUD.

Aims

The aim was to assess the effectiveness of CM for patients

with SUD using existing studies.

Methods

Systematic reviewof CM interventions for patientswith

SUD by analyzing randomized controlled studies on this matter

found on the electronic database PubMed published between 1996

and 2016.

Results and conclusions

Most of the analyzed studies showed

improvement on the chosen outcome measures, although, these

varied in the different studies. Mainly the treatment adherence

improved, but substance use only reduced in a third of the studies.

Overall functioning improved in about half of the studies. Further,

studies are necessary to determine inclusion criteria for CM treat-

ment for patients suffering from SUD in order to orientate patients

most likely to benefit from this approach to the specific CM pro-

grams. There are still only few studies on this intervention and

SUD. Further, studies are needed to examine the effect of treat-

ment intensity of the CM intervention. Also longitudinal studies

are needed to ensure the effectiveness of these treatments.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1757