Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  734 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 734 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S730

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S710–S771

Table 1

City

n

= 78 (%)

Countryside

n

= 168 (%)

Chi

2

P

Total

n

= 246

Complaint in each

group of

symptoms

16 (20.5)

30 (17.9)

0.01 0.963 36 (18.7)

Two complaints in

each group of

symptoms

32 (41.0)

64 (38.1)

0.01 0.982 96 (39.0)

Three complaints

in each group of

symptoms

18 (23.1)

26 (15.5)

0.4 0.549 44 (17.9)

Table 2

City

n

= 70 (%)

Countryside

n

= 150 (%)

Chi

2

P

Total

n

= 220

Two and more of

psychophysio-

logical

spts

26 (37.1) 12 (8)

7.8 0.005 38 (17.3)

Two and more of

sociological and

psychological

spts

8 (11.4) 24 (16)

0.1 0.793 32 (14.5)

Two and more of

behavioral spts

10 (14.3) 10 (6.7)

0.7 0.414 20 (9.1)

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1332

EV1003

Prevention of specific learning

disorders in early stages

I.R. Lupu

1 ,

, V. Lupu

2

1

Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Center of Mental Health,

Cluj Napoca, Romania

2

“Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,

Department of Psychiatry and Pedopsychiatry, Cluj Napoca, Romania

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Specific learning disorders as defined in the DSM-5

are frequently diagnosed among children– 4–9% for reading deficits

– (DSM-5, 2013). As any deficit can contribute not only to a child’s

emotional distress, it can also result in academic failure or school

abandonment. Therefore, prevention measures should be consid-

ered.

Objectives

The present study’s objective was to compare the

influence of a set of primary prevention measures on children’s

performance in reading and writing and improve their reading and

writing.

Aims

We aimed to prevent specific learning disorders–dyslexia

and dysgraphia in children from the second to their third year in

the educational system.

Methods

Only children from the second year of school were

considered (grade I). Children with clear potential for develop-

ing specific learning disorders were included in the present study.

Children with any other comorbidity were excluded from the data

analysis. Four experimental groups were considered – one control

and three interventional – 1. Control, 2. COPS method, 3. Meixner

principles, and 4. COPS method combined with Meixner princi-

ples and considering improvement of reading images, image filling,

graphical schema orientation and discrimination, spatial and tem-

poral orientation, orientation of objects, fine motor skills, temporal

sequences, attention for details, perception of differences.

Results

Findings indicated that the use of the combined meth-

ods significantly improved children’s performance in reading and

writing. Though all interventional methods improved children’s

performance. Results comparison was computed.

Conclusions

Early prevention programs which that target both

reading and writing can improve children’s performance in reading

and writing.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1333

EV1004

The use of vitamin D3 sublingual

tablets versus oral drops in the

treatment of patients with COMT

Val/Val genotype and major

depressive disorder

A.W. Mech

Mech Healthcare Associates, MechMatrix, University of Texas at

Arlington, USA

Introduction

Vitamin D has been shown to be crucial in the

regulation of dopamine and its relationship to major depressive

disorder.

A five-year pre-interventional study of 25 hydroxy vitamin D levels

in patients with major depressive disorder found values ranging

from 17 to 32 ng/mL.

COMT Val/Val genotype has been associated with a 20–40% more

rapid breakdown of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex as compared

to individuals with a Val/Met genotype.

Methods

This retrospective study gathered data concerning out-

come measurements in patients who displayed a baseline 25-OH

level < 30mg/mL and initially treated with sublingual tablet form

of 10,000 IU vitamin D3. These data were compared to post inter-

ventional depression outcome scores for patients switched to oral

vitamin D3 drops at a dose of 10,000 IUs.

Results

Scores on the MADRS 1–3 weeks following the vitamin

D3 switch showed an improvement in mood with the lowering of

scores on the MADRS.

Conclusions

Patients with a COMT genotype of Val/Val showed

clinical improvement with a switch from oral D3 sublingual tablets

to oral D3 drops. Further studies are needed to draw from conclu-

sions. Pre- and post-25-OH vitamin D levels and other dopamine

synthesis variables including serum ferritinwould be useful as well

as prospective double-blind placebo controlled trials. The future

use of genotype-specific and supportive approaches deserves seri-

ous investigation.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1334

EV1005

Ultra-high risk psychosis. A case

report

G. Pardo de Santayana

1 ,

, R. Landera

1

, M. Juncal

1

, O. Porta

1

,

M. Gómez

2

, N. Nú˜nez

2

, L. Sánchez

1

1

Hospital Universitario Marques De Valdecilla, Psychiatry,

Santander, Spain

2

Hospital Universitario Alava-sede Santiago, Psychiatry,

Vitoria-gasteiz, Spain

Corresponding author.

Introduction

There is much debate on whether patients who are

at high risk of developing a psychotic disorder in the near future

(such as patients suffering of attenuated psychotic symptoms, brief

limited intermittent psychotic symptoms or personality trait vul-

nerability) should be treated with antipsychotic drugs to prevent

possible psychotic breaks from happening.

Aim

To review articles from the existing medical literature about

treatment of patients in ultra-high risk of developing psychosis.