Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  758 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 758 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S754

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S710–S771

Introduction

It is not known whether sex and age are risk factors

for neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS).

Objectives

To examine sex and age distributions in NMS patients

based on a systematic review of the literature.

Aims

Estimate the sex-specific relative risk of an NMS diagnosis.

Methods

EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched in

November 2014 using broad, unrestricted criteria to identify any

published observation of NMS. Any physically (online or hard copy)

accessible and interpretable (using language translation software)

report published from January 1, 1998 through November 1, 2014

was considered for inclusion. Secondary sources (e.g., reviews)

were included when primary sources could not be accessed. All

cases for which the patient’s sex or the sample’s sex distribution

was provided were included, except for redundant reports and

cases in which NMS was not the most likely clinical diagnosis. Sex

ratio and age distributionswere examined using standard graphical

techniques and measures of association.

Results

Twenty-eight independent NMS sex ratio estimates were

included. Most sex ratio estimates (75%) indicated male prepon-

derance, with a median of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.20–1.80). NMS incidence

peaked at age 20–25 years and declined steadily thereafter; males

consistently outnumbered females at all age intervals. Major study

limitations are the heterogeneity of case ascertainment procedures

and the potential for publication bias.

Conclusions

NMS patients are 50% more likely to be males, and

NMS is most likely to occur in young adulthood. Men, and all young

adults, appear to be at increased risk for NMS.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1406

EV1077

A Comparison of DSM-IV and

international expert consensus

diagnostic criteria for N.M.S

R. Gurrera

1 ,

, G .

Mortillaro

1 , V.

Velamoor

2 , S. C

aroff

3

1

VA Boston Healthcare System, Mental Health/Psychiatry, Brockton,

USA

2

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario,

Psychiatry, London, USA

3

Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania,

Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) requires

prompt recognition for effective management, but there are no

established diagnostic criteria.

Objectives

To validate the recently published international

expert consensus (IEC) diagnostic criteria for NMS, which assign

priority points based on the relative importance of each criterion

for diagnosing NMS.

Aims

Determine optimal diagnostic cutoff for priority point

score.

Methods

Data were extracted from 221 archived telephone con-

tact reports of clinician-initiated calls to a national telephone

consultation service from 1997–2009; each case was given a total

priority point score based on the IEC criteria. DSM-IV-TR research

criteria, in original form and modified to accept less than ‘severe’

rigidity, served as the primary diagnostic reference standard. Con-

sultants’ diagnoses served as an additional reference standard. The

optimal priority point cutoff score was determined using receiver

operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Area under the ROC curve ranged from 0.715 (95%

CI = 0.645–0.785,

P

< 0.001) for consultant diagnoses to 0.857 (95%

CI = 0.808–0.907,

P

< 0.001) for modified DSM-IV-TR criteria. The

latter was associated with 69.6% sensitivity and 90.7% specificity.

Conclusions

Agreement was best between IEC criteria with a cut-

off score of 74 and modified DSM-IV-TR criteria (sensitivity 69.6%,

specificity 90.7%); this cutoff score demonstrated the highest agree-

ment in all comparisons. Consultant diagnoses showedmuch better

agreement with modified, compared to original, DSM-IV-TR crite-

ria, suggesting that theDSM-IV-TR criterion of “severe” rigiditymay

be more restrictive than what most knowledgeable clinicians use

in practice.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1407

EV1078

Advantages of second-generation

long-acting injectable anti-psychotics:

Focus on hospital admission rates in

southeast Tuscany

P. Iazzetta

1 ,

, A. Forte

1

, G. Cesari

2

, C. Lucii

3

, N. Magnani

4

,

G. Cardamone

5

1

Unità Funzionale Salute Mentale Adulti “Colline dell’Albegna”,

Dipartimento Salute Mentale USL Sudest Toscana, Orbetello, Italy

2

UFSMA Arezzo, Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Arezzo, Italy

3

UFSMA Siena, Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Siena, Italy

4

UFSMA Area Grossetana, Dipartimento Salute Mentale, Grosseto,

Italy

5

UFSMA Area Grossetana, Dipartimento Salute Mentale, USL sudest

Toscana, Grosseto, Italy

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Several studies suggested that second-generation

long-acting injectable anti-psychotics (SGA-LAIs) might be effec-

tive on preventing relapse and admission/readmission rates among

patients affected by schizophrenic and bipolar disorders. Moreover,

studies highlighted that SGA-LAIs may reduce costs and healthcare

resource utilization (HRU) among community psychiatric settings.

Objectives

The objective of the present study was to evaluate

whether the increased use of SGA-LAIs among community psychi-

atric services in southern Tuscany was related to:

– reduced costs and HRU;

– reduced hospital admission/readmission.

Methods

Data consisted of both regional registry and data

prospectively collected at admission and/or follow up assess-

ments. Patients included were: patients affected by schizophre-

nia/schizoaffective or bipolar disorders, treated with SGA-LAIs.

Results

The increased use of SGA-LAIs was related to a significant

reduction of admission and/or readmission rates, as long as a sig-

nificant reduction in costs and HRU among the community services

included in the study.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that SGA-LAIs might

have a positive cost/effectiveness profile and could reduce hospi-

talizations, costs and HRU among a community sample. This could

be related to a better tolerability of SGA-LAIs compared to FGA-

LAIs, and less adverse effects. More studies on community samples

should focus on the cost/effectiveness profile of SGA-LAIs.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1408

EV1079

Clozapine efficiency in tardive

syndromes induced by anti-psychotic

treatment

L. Jouini

1 ,

, U. Ouali

1

, R. Zaouche

2

, R. Jomli

1

, Y. Zgueb

1

,

F. Nacef

1

1

Razi Hospital, “A” Psychiatry Department, Tunis, Tunisia

2

Razi Hospital, Psychiatry Outpatient Unit, Tunis, Tunisia

Corresponding author.