Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  242 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 242 / 916 Next Page
Page Background European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S238–S302

Available online at

ScienceDirect

www.sciencedirect.com

25th European Congress of Psychiatry

e-Poster Walk part 3

e-Poster Walk: Depression – part 2

EW0388

Genetic variants in the

ABCB1

gene

determine bioavailability of

antidepressants in the brain

E. Holsboer-Trachsler

1 ,

, B. Breitenstein

2

, T. Kirmeier

2

,

F. Holsboer

2

1

Psychiatric Clinics UPK of the University of Basel, Center for

Affective, Stress and Sleep Disorders, Basel, Switzerland

2

HMNC Brain Health, None, Munich, Germany

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Antidepressants are the first-line treatment of

major depressive disorder, but response rates following the first

antidepressant medication are moderate.

Objectives

Clinical efficacy requires to overcome the blood-brain

barrier where p-gp molecules are located. If they recognize and

bind an antidepressant, they pump it back into the circulation. If

the antidepressant is not recognized, the passage is not impaired

by p-glycoproteins.

Aims

We studied whether variants in the

ABCB1

gene that

encodes the p-glycoprotein have an effect on blood-brain passage

of antidepressants and as consequence on their clinical benefit.

Methods ABCB1

gene variants were determined with sequencing

(Illumina Bead), substrate property analysis employed mice with

deletion of ABCB1-analog genes. Clinical protocols followed those

of the MARS-project.

Results

– The SNPs rs2032583 and rs2235015 provide the best

clinical information about blood-brain-penetrance, with CC/CT and

TT/GT being the favourable gene variants whereas TT and GG are

less favourable. This distinction holds only true if antidepressants

are p-glycoprotein substrates;

– in the presence of the favourable gene-variant patients treated

with an antidepressant that is a p-glycoprotein substrate are more

likely to remit in shorter time;

– in the presence of the less favourable gene-variant treatment with

a substrate, higher dosages and augmentation strategies, or switch

to non-substrates are recommended.

Conclusion

From these data, a treatment algorithm was devel-

oped that maximizes treatment benefit and minimizes adverse

effects.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.002

EW0389

Self-stigma and quality of life in

outpatients with depressive

disorder – a cross-sectional study

M. Holubova

1 , 2 ,

, J. Prasko

1

, M. Ociskova

1

, M. Marackova

1

,

A. Grambal

1

, M. Slepecky

3

1

University of Palacky Olomouc, Department of Psychiatry, Olomouc,

Czech Republic

2

Regional Hospital Liberec, Department of Psychiatry, Liberec, Czech

Republic

3

Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Department of

Psychology Sciences, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Corresponding author.

Background

Self-stigma is a maladaptive psychosocial phe-

nomenon that may disturbmany areas of patient’s life and have the

negative impact on their quality of life. The present study explored

the association between self-stigma, quality of life, demographic

data, and the severity of symptoms in patients with depressive

disorder.

Method

Patients, who met ICD-10 research criteria for depres-

sive disorder, were enrolled in the cross-sectional study. All

probands completed these measurements: the Quality of Life

Satisfaction and Enjoyment Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), the Inter-

nalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI), demographic

questionnaire, and the severity of the disorder measured by

objective and subjective Clinical Global Impression severity scales

(CGI).

Results

Eighty-one depressive patients (with persistent affec-

tive disorder – dysthymia, major depressive disorder or recurrent

depressive disorder) and 43 healthy controls contributed to the

study. Comparing with the healthy control group, there was a

lower quality of life in patients with depression. The level of self-

stigma correlated positively with total symptom severity score and

negatively with the quality of life. Multiple regression analysis

discovered that the overall rating of objective symptoms severity

and self-stigma were significantly associated with the quality of

life.

Conclusions

Present study suggests the lower quality of life in

outpatients with depressive disorder in comparison with healthy

controls, and the negative impact of self-stigma level on quality of

life in patients suffering from depressive disorders.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.003

0924-9338/