Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  240 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 240 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S236

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S170–S237

EW0382

The risk of depression and anxiety in

the post-diagnostic period of multiple

sclerosis measured by screening

instruments and structured

interviews

H. Hoang

1 ,

, E. Stenager

1

, E. Stenager

2

1

Institute of Regional Health Service, Research Unit of Mental Health,

University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

2

Institute of Regional Health Service, Department of

Neurology – Sønderborg, Odense, Denmark

Corresponding author.

Objective

To examine the risk of depression and anxiety in MS

patients in the post-diagnostic period by using clinical screening

instruments and a diagnostic structured clinical interview.

Method

A population of 134 MS patients was examined for the

risk of depression and anxiety in the post-diagnostic period of MS

using the clinical screening instruments Beck Depression Inven-

tory (BDI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Within six weeks of diagnosis, patients with cut-off > 12 for BDI

and > 7 for HADS were offered a clinical structured interview using

the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry/SCAN

Version 2.1.

Results

The prevalence of depressive symptoms and depression

in the post-diagnostic period of MS was 49.2% when using the

screening instruments, but only 15.2% when using the SCAN inter-

view. For anxiety, the prevalence was 3.4% for both the screening

instruments and the SCAN interview in the post-diagnostic period

of MS.

Conclusion

MS patients have a risk of depression and anxiety

in the post-diagnostic period of MS, but it is crucial to consider

which tools to use in a clinical setting to investigate depression

and anxiety in MS patients.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Psychiatric co-morbidity;

Depression; Anxiety; HADS; BDI-II; Diagnostic interview

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.2252

EW0383

Psychosis induced by interferon- –A

limitation of treatment

M. Marinho

1 ,

, M. Mota-Oliveira

1

, J. Marques

2

, M. Braganc¸ a

1

1

São João Hospital Centre, Clinic of Psychiatry and Mental Health,

Porto, Portugal

2

Local Healthcare Unit of Matosinhos, Clinic of Psychiatry,

Matosinhos, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Psychosis is an uncommon but serious complication

of treatment with interferon- , a cytokine frequently used to treat

several infectious and malignant diseases.

Objectives

To provide an overview of interferon- -induced psy-

chosis.

Methods

Literature reviewbased onPubMed/MEDLINE, using the

keywords “interferon- ” and “psychosis”.

Results

Psychotic symptoms usually emerge between 6 to 46

weeks and on average 3 months after the start of interferon-

treatment, occurring most frequently in the form of persecutory,

guilt or grandeur delusions and auditory hallucinations. Often they

are accompanied by mood symptoms, anxiety, attention distur-

bances and insomnia. Many factors are known to increase the

risk of psychiatric effects as a whole associated with interferon-

. Pathogenesis of interferon-induced psychosis remains unclear,

however several theories have been discussed, namely the over-

lap influence of biological vulnerability and the cytokine’s action

on the brain. Dopaminergic, opioid, serotoninergic and glutamin-

ergic pathways as well as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

hypersensitivity are some of the hypotheses raised about the

underlying cause of that susceptibility. Psychosismanagement usu-

ally includes stopping interferon- and introducing antipsychotics

with minimal antidopaminergic effects and at the lowest possible

dose, due to the increased risk of extrapyramidal reactions in these

patients.

Conclusion

The decision to use interferon-based treatments in

psychiatric patients should be highly individualized. Early recogni-

tion and adequate treatment of interferon-induced psychosismight

prevent subsequent emergence of serious debilitating symptoms.

Thus, it is very important that medical and psychiatric treatment

teams work closely together and are familiar with this important

subject.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.2253

EW0384

Depression among cancer patients–A

reality where therapeutic nihilism

cannot be accepted

M. Marinho

1 ,

, J. Marques

2

, M. Braganc¸ a

1

1

São João Hospital Centre, Clinic of Psychiatry and Mental Health,

Porto, Portugal

2

Local Healthcare Unit of Matosinhos, Clinic of Psychiatry,

Matosinhos, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Cancer is a life-threatening disease, characterized

by a great deal of uncertainty and unpredictability. Thus, several

stressors and emotional upheavals pervade the everyday life of

cancer patients and can lead to the development of depression.

Objectives

To review the recent research related to depression in

cancer patients.

Methods

Literature reviewbased onPubMed/MEDLINE, using the

keywords “cancer” and “depression”.

Results

It is estimated that 20–25% of cancer patients meet the

criteria for major depressive syndrome at some point in their ill-

ness. Depression is associated with a negative impact on treatment

adhesion, cancer progression and quality of life, besides increas-

ing suicide risk. However, it is often unrecognized and untreated.

Importantly, the mistaken belief that depressive symptoms are

expected in this group, the overlap between the neurovegetative

symptoms of depression, the somatic symptoms of cancer and its

treatment, as well as the effects of comorbid diseases make the

diagnosis of major depression so complex in these patients. Some

of the most helpful diagnostic indicators are feelings of hopeless-

ness, worthlessness, excessive guilt, loss of self-esteem, and wishes

to die. The several risk factors for the development of depres-

sion in cancer patients can be divided into four broad categories,

namely cancer-related factors, cancer treatment-related factors,

psychiatric history, and social factors. Effective management of

depression consists in a combination of psychotherapy and psy-

chopharmacology.

Conclusion

Depression in cancer patients has serious conse-

quences, however appropriate psychiatric intervention can do it

over. Thus, its early recognition and appropriate management is

imperative.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.2254