Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  395 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 395 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

25th European congress of psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S365–S404

S391

8

University of South Australia, Department of Rural Health, Whyalla,

Australia

9

Hamad Medical Corporation, Health Services and Population

Research Centre, Doha, Qatar

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Annual monitoring of physical health of peoplewith

severe mental illness (SMI) in primary or secondary care is recom-

mended in England.

Objective

The SMI Health Improvement Profile (HIP) was devel-

oped to target physical well-being in SMI through the role of the

mental health nurse.

Aim

The primary aim was to investigate if health checks per-

formed by community mental health nurses (CMHNs) trained to

use the HIP improved the physical well-being of patients with SMI

at 12 months.

Methods

A single blind, parallel group randomised controlled

trial of training to use the HIP (clustered at the level of the nurse).

Physical well-beingwasmeasured in study patients using the phys-

ical component score of the SF36v2 at baseline and at 12 months.

Results

Sixty CMHNs (working with 173 patients) were assigned

to the HIP programme (training to use the HIP) or treatment as

usual. The HIP was completed with 38 (42%) patients at baseline

and 22 (24%) at follow-up in the HIP programme group. No effect

of the HIP programme on physical health-related quality of life of

study patients was identified, a finding supported by per protocol

analyses.

Conclusions

This study found no evidence that CMHN delivered

health checks following training to use the HIP are effective at

improving the physical well-being of SMI patients at one year. More

attention to methods that aim to enable the delivery, receipt and

enactment of evidence-based interventions to improve physical

health outcomes in this population is urgently required.

ISRCTN: 41137900.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.439

EW0826

Brainstem audiometry as a diagnostic

tool in psychiatry: Preliminary results

from a blinded study

V. Wahlström

1

, R. Wynn

2 , 3 ,

1

Balsfjord General Practitioner’s Office, Balsfjord, Norway

2

UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Clinical

Medicine, Tromsø, Norway

3

University Hospital of North Norway, Division of Psychiatry and

Substance Abuse, Tromsø, Norway

Corresponding author.

Background

Some prior studies of brainstem audiometry have

found illness-specific aberrations, suggesting that this procedure

can be of use to clinicians in diagnosing certain psychiatric illnesses.

Aims

The study aimed to examine the diagnostic properties of a

brain stem audiometry procedure (SD-BERA

®

) for patients suffer-

ing from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Methods

A blinded study including 12 patients with schizophre-

nia, 12 patients with bipolar disorder, and 12 healthy controls was

performed in 2014/2015. The patients were recruited from psy-

chiatric specialist services and a primary care office in the County

of Troms, Norway. The patients and controls were examined with

brainstem audiometry. The clinical diagnoses were not known to

the researchers who analysed the brain stem audiometry data at

the Swedish company SensoDetect. Sensitivity and specificity for

each group (compared to healthy controls) was calculated.

Results

The brain stem audiometry procedure had a high degree

of sensitivity (1.00), but a lower degree of specificity (0.45) when

patients suffering from bipolar disorder were compared to healthy

controls. For the diagnosis of schizophrenia, the brain stemaudiom-

etry procedure had a high degree of specificity (0.91), but a

lower degree of sensitivity (0.33) when patients were compared

to healthy controls.

Conclusions

This method may help clinicians by lending support

to a clinically suspected diagnosis of schizophrenia. The relatively

low specificity for bipolar disorder could suggest that the method

needs further development before it can be useful clinically when

the diagnosis of bipolar disorder is suspected. Further scientific

testing is needed to verify these findings.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.440

EW0827

Aripiprazole in treatment of disability

in social, professional and family life

in schizophrenia patients

N. Zivkovic

, G. Djokic , D. Curcic

Psychiatric Clinic Laza Lazarevic, Emergency Psychiatry Department,

Belgrade, Serbia

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Enhancement of overall functioning is one of most

important goals in treatment of schizophrenia (SCH) patients.

Objective

To assess efficacy of aripiprazole in treatment of dis-

ability and impairment in social, professional and family life in SCH

patients.

Methods

This study included 50 patients with SCH diagnosed

by ICD-10 criteria, divided into H (Haloperidol, 5–20mg/24 h)

group (25 patients), and A (Aripiprazole, 10–30mg/24 h) group (25

patients). Antipsychotics were tested for 12 months with Positive

and Negative Symptom Schedule Scale (PANSS), Sheehan Disability

Scale (SDS) and the number of withdrawals attributed to adverse

event (AE).

Results

The mean pretrial PANSS score was 103.6 in A and 105.3

inHgroup. Themean PANSS score after 12monthswas 53.5 inA and

54.4 in H group. There were no significant statistical difference in

PANSS pretrial scores and scores after 12 months between groups,

P

= 0.619;

P

= 0.364. There were significant statistical difference in

PANSS score reduction after 12 months in both groups (

P

< 0.001).

Aripiprazole improved all SDS scores in comparison to Haloperidol

with high statistical significance.Work: A vs. H,

P

< 0.001; social life:

A vs. H,

P

< 0.001; family life: A vs. H,

P

< 0.001; days lost: A vs. H,

P

= 0.012; days unproductive: A vs. H,

P

= 0.007; 8.0% AEs occurred

in A, and 36.0% in H group.

Conclusions

Aripiprazole showed same efficacy as haloperidol in

treatment of SCH. Aripiprazole showed significantly better efficacy

in treatment of disability and impairment. Number of withdrawals

was significantly higher in haloperidol group.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.441

EW0828

Smoking and tardive dyskinesia in

patients with schizophrenia

L. Zouari , N. Smaoui , I. Abida , N. Charfi

, M.

Maâlej , N. Zouari ,

J. Ben Thabet , M. Maâlej

Hédi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry, Sfax, Tunisia

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a drug-induced move-

ment disorder that arises with antipsychotics. These drugs are the

mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia. Epidemiological studies

have shown mixed results on smoking’s association with TD.