Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  390 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 390 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S386

25th European congress of psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S365–S404

correlations for the sub groups with clinically detectable OCSs

(YBOCS > 8) and clinically significant OCSs (YBOCS > 14).

Results

The only significant correlationwas that of scores of OCSs

withPANSS general psychopathology scores (rho = 0.190,

P

= 0.047).

Obsessions and compulsions did not significantly correlate with

positive or negative symptom clusters. No significant correlation

between OCSs and schizophrenia symptoms were detected in the

subgroups with clinically detectable or significant OCSs.

Conclusions

OCSs appear to be a separate symptom cluster in the

context of schizophrenia, suggesting that OCSs cannot be expected

to be influenced by standard antipsychotic treatments.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.425

EW0812

Obsessive compulsive symptoms,

social functioning and executive

functions in chronic schizophrenia

E. Theochari

1 ,

, E. Tsaltas

2

, D. Kontis

3

1

Psychiatric Hospital of Attica “Dromokaiteio”, Tarsi, Athens

Chaidari, Greece

2

Athens University Medical School, Experimental Psychology

Laboratory, 1st Department of Psychiatry, Athens, Greece

3

Psychiatric Hospital of Attica, Cognitive Rehabilitation Unit, Athens,

Greece

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Schizophrenia leads to functional deficits. A third

of schizophrenia patients have obsessive compulsive symptoms

(OCSs). The existing studies, which have investigated the effect

of OCSs on social functioning (SF) of schizophrenia patients have

produced contradictory findings and, interestingly, they have not

adjusted for the role of executive functioning.

Objectives

To investigate the predictive role of OCSs on SF in

schizophrenia controlling for the effects of executive functioning.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study of 110 chronic schizophrenia

patients we assessed OCSs (Yale-Brown Scale), SF (Strauss Carpen-

ter Scale) and composite executive function (cognitive flexibility:

Intra–extra dimensional set shifting task and planning: Stockings

of Cambridge task) using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test

Automated Battery (CANTAB). We also measured total symptoms

(PANSS total scores) and illness duration. Regression analysis tested

the predicting role of OCSs (YBOCS total score) on functioning tak-

ing into account executive function (composite score) duration of

illness and schizophrenia symptoms.

Results

OCSs were associated with better SF (B = 0.099; 95%

CI = 0.019, 0.180;

t

= 2.449; df = 88;

P

= 0.016). This result was driven

by the association of OCSs with job functioning (B = 0.043; 95%

CI = 0.006, 0.081;

t

= 2.289; df = 88;

P

= 0.024). Executive functions

were not significantly associated with social functioning.

Conclusions

OCSs andnot executive functions are associatedwith

social functioning in schizophrenia. Future studies should exam-

ine whether OCSs represent a compensatory mechanism aiming at

preserving social functioning in the disorder.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.426

EW0813

Real-world effectiveness of

antipsychotic treatments among

patients with schizophrenia and

affective symptoms

J. Tiihonen

1 ,

, M. Lähteenvuo

2

, F. Hoti

3

, P. Vattulainen

3

,

H. Taipale

4

, A. Tanskanen

1

1

Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience,

Stockholm, Sweden

2

University of Eastern Finland, Department of Forensic Psychiatry,

Kuopio, Finland

3

Epid Research, Pharmacoepidemiologic Research, Espoo, Finland

4

University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric

Care, Kuopio, Finland

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The clinical distinction between schizophrenia and

affective psychoses is often not clear-cut, and very little is known

about the effectiveness of treatments among patients having both

schizophrenia and affective symptoms.

Objectives

To study the comparative real-world effectiveness of

antipsychotic treatments among patients having schizophrenia and

affective symptoms.

Methods

We studied the risk of all-cause rehospitalizationduring

use of specific antipsychotics during 1996–2012 among all patients

who had been previously hospitalizedwith both schizophrenia and

mood disorder diagnoses in Finland since 1987 (

n

= 28,015). We

linked nation-wide databases on hospitalization, mortality, and

filled prescriptions. The primary analysis was within-individual

analysis, in which each individual was used as his/her own

control to eliminate selection bias. The effect of concomitant psy-

chotropic medications, and the temporal orders of exposure and

non-exposure periods were adjusted.

Results

When 22 specific antipsychotic treatments were com-

pared with the most frequently used antipsychotic quetiapine, the

lowest rehospitalization risks were observed during the treatment

periods of olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) (HR: 0.52; 95% CI:

0.34–0.80), risperidone LAI (0.67; 0.56–0.81), and clozapine (0.68;

0.63–0.74). The worst outcome was observed for periciazine (1.19;

0.96–1.48) and no antipsychotic use (1.09; 1.04–1.13).

Conclusions

Olanzapine LAI, risperidone LAI, and clozapine use

are associated with the lowest risk of rehospitalization among

patients with schizophrenia and affective symptoms.

Disclosure of interest

Jari Tiihonen has served as a consultant to

The Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers

Squibb, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck,

Organon, and Finnish Medicines Agency he has received fees for

giving expert testimony to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli

Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka and Pfizer

lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glax-

oSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer and

grants from Stanley Foundation and Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.

Tiihonen is a member of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly,

Janssen-Cilag, and Otsuka, and has research collaboration with

Lilly and Janssen. Markku Lähteenvuo is a major shareholder and

board member at Genomi Solutions ltd, a Finnish based bioinfor-

matics company. He has also received research grants or awards

from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and is working as a coordinator for

a research project funded by the Stanley Foundation. Fabian Hoti

and Pia Vattulainen are employed by EPID Research, which is a

contract research organization that performs commissioned phar-

macoepidemiological studies and thus its employees have been and

currently are working in collaborationwith several pharmaceutical

companies. Antti Tanskanen and Heidi Taipale have participated in

research projects funded by Janssenwith grants paid to the Karolin-

ska Institutet.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.427