Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  566 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 566 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S562

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S521–S582

the potential roles of mental health literacy and stigmatization in

influencing treatment-seeking behaviors.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.814

e-Poster viewing: Emergency psychiatry

EV0485

What is commonly missed in the

suicidal risk assessments in the

emergency room?

N. Alavi

1 ,

, T. Reshetukha

2

, E. Prost

2

, A. Kristen

2

, D. Groll

2

1

University of Toronto, Psychiatry, Toronto, Canada

2

Queen’s University, Psychiatry, Kingston, Canada

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Suicidal behaviour remains the most common rea-

son for presentation to the emergency rooms. In spite of identifiable

risk factors, suicide remains essentially unpredictable by current

tools and assessments. Moreover, some factorsmay not be included

consistently in the suicidal risk assessments in the emergency room

by either emergency medicine physicians or psychiatrists.

Method

Step 1 involved the administration of a survey on the

importance of suicide predictors for assessment between psychi-

atry and emergency medicine specialties. In step 2 a chart review

of psychiatric emergency room patients in Kingston, Canada was

conducted to determine suicide predictor documentation rates. In

step 3, based on the result of the first 2 steps a suicide risk assess-

ment tool (Suicide RAP [Risk Assessment Prompt]) was developed

and presented to both teams. A second patient chart review was

conducted to determine the effectiveness of the educational inter-

vention and suicide RAP in suicide risk assessment.

Results

Significant differences were found in the rating of impor-

tance and the documentation rates of suicide predictors between

the two specialties. Several predictors deemed important, have

low documentation rates. Thirty of the suicide predictors showed

increased rates of documentation after the educational interven-

tion and the presentation of the suicide RAP.

Conclusion

Though a surfeit of information regarding patient risk

factors for suicide is available, clinicians and mental health profes-

sionals face difficulties in integrating and applying this information

to individuals. Based on the result of this study suicide RAP and edu-

cational intervention could be helpful in improving the suicidal risk

assessment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.815

EV0486

Antipsychotic drugs in pregnancy

S. AlDakheel

King Fahd Hospital of the University, Psychiatry, Dhahran, Saudi

Arabia

Background

There has been significant increase in prescription

of antipsychotic medication in the community for females in child-

bearing age the problem is we do not have clear guidelines because

we do not have a control group.

Objectives

To evaluate maternal psychiatric, medical and perina-

tal outcomes associated with antipsychotic drugs in pregnancy.

Aim

To use wisdom when the risk is minimal for both mother

and child.

Method

We study 3 pregnant women, one with a 6 years old, one

with a 2 years old child and one still pregnant. We measure their

blood sugar, blood pressure, fetal heart, movement, ultrasound

using first generation antipsychotic (FGA).

Results

Patient became less psychotic then back to normal and

fetal development is normal till now, no diabetes mellitus or hyper-

tension, no malformation or abortion.

Conclusion

It is still too early to reach a clear and absolute use of

safe antipsychotic drugs in pregnancy. A large sample is needed for

a study and a control should be needed.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.816

EV0487

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome:

A rare, life-threatening and not fully

understood condition

P. Cabral Barata

, J.C. Melo , T. Maia

Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Servic¸ o de Psiquiatria,

Amadora, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) is a rare

life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction associated with the use of

neuroleptics. It is characterized by delirium, muscular rigidity, fever

and autonomic nervous system dysregulation. Its diagnosis rep-

resents a significant challenge for clinicians and many aspects

regarding its epidemiology, etiopathology and nosology remain

controversial.

Objectives

Summarize current knowledge to facilitate NMS diag-

nosis and allow a fast onset of therapeutic and life-saving

interventions.

Methods

Non-systematic review of the literature–scientific pub-

lications from Pubmed and a Psychiatry Textbook.

Results

NMS typically develops during the first week after the

neuroleptic is introduced, although it may also appear after years

of treatment. Its incidence is of 0.02 to 3% in patients taking antipsy-

chotics; the mean age of its patients is 50 years. Typical symptoms

are muscle rigidity and temperature greater than 38

C in a patient

on antipsychotic; however, recent reports indicate that these core

symptoms may not always be present. Several risk factors have

also been identified and must be addressed. NMS may be fatal in

10 to 20% of cases or may produce residual sequelae, like cogni-

tive dysfunction or neurological deficits. NMS must be managed

by aggressive use of supportive measures, as well as specific inter-

ventions. It recurs in 30% of patients, which can be diminished by

specific measures.

Discussion

NMS requires timely and accurate diagnosis and treat-

ment. Antipsychotics should be used cautiously in patients at

increased risk. When recognizing this condition, prompt with-

drawal of the offending agent is the most important step. Wise

approaches can diminish morbidity, mortality and recurrence.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.817

EV0488

Evaluation of experts’ clinical practice

in crisis unit and psychiatric

emergency technical and therapeutic

principles to better intervene

J. Denis

, S. Hendrick

University of Mons, Systemic and Psychodynamic Clinical Psychology

Department, Mons, Belgium

Corresponding author.