European Psychiatry - Volume 41 - April 2017

834 / 916

S830 25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S772–S846
recovery with complete withdrawal of all presented symptoms,
our patient developed a malignant hypertermia that was resistant
to all applicated medications. Our dilemma is whether presented
symptoms of malignant hyperthermia are related to malignant
neuroleptic syndrome or not?
Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
EV1297
Community based mental health care
as an example of good outcomes for
young persons with episode of acute
and transient psychotic
disorders – Case study
G. Racetovic ∗, S. Popovic , B. Rosic , S. Grujic-Timarac
1 Health Center-HC, Community Mental Health Center, CMHC,
Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 Public Health Institution HC, Health Center, Prijedor, Bosnia and
Herzegovina
3 Hospital Dr Mladen Stojanovic, Department of Psychiatry, Prijedor,
Bosnia and Herzegovina
∗ Corresponding author.
Introduction The prevalence of acute and transient psychotic dis-
order (ATPD) varies from 3.9–9.6 per 100,000 population ven
it has clinical course with psychosis, there is no evidence that ATPD
is similar with schizophrenia
Objectives Since in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) are not estab-
lished specialized services for early interventions (EI), community
mental health centers (CMHC) are basic services for fast and most
efficient interventions in the cases of ATPD among other psychi-
atric disorders. The mental health reform has planned to establish
EI services in the future
Aims and method To show CMHC as efficient service in the treat-
ment of ATPD without using hospitalisation of young woman with
two years follow up (case study)
Results Full recovery of young female with ATPD using team
approach and model of case management. After follow up of two
years was any indications that psychotic disorders will develop.
Conclusions Evenwe have not EI specialized services in our coun-
try, CMHC have capacities to manage ATDP in community settings
avoiding hospitalisation of young people.
Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
References
[1] Singh SP, Burns T, Amin S, Jones PB, Harrison G. Acute transient
psychotic disorders: precursors epidemiology course outcome.
Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:452–9.
[2] Malhotra S. Acute and transient psychotic disorders: compari-
son with schizophrenia. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2003;5(3):178–86.
[3] Strategijamentalnog zdravlja u Republici Srpskoj do 2015, Banja
Luka: Ministarstvo zdravlja i socijalne zaˇstite Republike Srpske,
Banja Luka, 2008.
EV1298
When the term “schizophrenia” is
enough to modify the way you
interact with others: Evidence for a
motor synchrony task
N. Rainteau ∗, R. Salesse , S. Raffard , D. Capdevielle
Hôpital La Colombière, Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte,
Montpellier, France
∗ Corresponding author.
Introduction Most individuals with schizophrenia will be con-
frontedwith some forms of stigmatization. In recent years, the term
“schizophrenia” has been increasingly contested by clinicians and
family members and many of them argue for a change of name.
Surprisingly, most of the research has been explored though self-
reports but behavioural research is still lacking. The aim of our
study was to assess through an experimental design if the term
“schizophrenia” was enough to modify social behaviours.
Methods Eleven participants from the community were asked to
engage in three coordination tasks with a simple dot displayed
on a screen and moved by another person. Participants had to
synchronize their movements with either a schizophrenia patient,
a patient with neuro-emotional integration disorder (NEID) or a
healthy subject, situated in different rooms. Each condition was
counterbalanced between participants. In reality, the movements
of the dot were pre-recorded (five trajectories) and were therefore
identical for all three conditions.
Results Measuring the error between the displayed and per-
formed trajectories, participants coordinate worse when they
though interactingwith a schizophrenia or NEID patient in compar-
ison to the “healthy” (F(2.20) = 4.02; P= .034; n2P = 0.29) condition.
Post-hoc analysis revealed an even higher difference between
“schizophrenia” and “healthy” conditions (P = 0.01).
Conclusion Our study is the first to demonstrate that the label
“schizophrenia” directly impacts our behaviour, with negative con-
sequences on social interactions. However, our results cannot
confirm yet a positive effect induced by changing the name.
Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
EV1299
Comparison of hospitalization rates in
schizophrenic patients on first
generation versus second generation
antipsychotic depots
S. Rasool∗ oy
South Essex Partnership Trust, psychiatry, Basildon, United Kingdom
∗ Corresponding author.
Introduction There is limited data on the efficacy rates between
first and second generation antipsychotic depots. One good indi-
cator of efficacy is the rates of hospitalization. Some studies have
shown that second generation depot antipsychotics significantly
reduce hospitalizations rates as compared to conventional depots.
Objectives Comparison of hospitalization rates for patients with
schizophrenia on first and second generation antipsychotic depots.
Methods A retrospective observational study was done by
reviewing the records of an antipsychotic depot clinic in Essex,
United Kingdom. A list of 47 patients enrolled and receiving depot
antipsychotics was obtained. Their records were studied and hos-
pital admission rates calculated.
Results Of the 47 patients 11 were excluded as they were on
depot antipsychotics for non-schizophrenic diagnoses.
Of the 36 patients with schizophrenia, 12 were on second genera-
tion and 24 were on first generation depots.
Amongst the 24 patients on first generation depots, 19 were male,
5 female and mean age was 52 years.
Of the 12 patients on second generation depots, 10 were male and
2 female and mean age was 46 years.
When comparing hospital admission rates between the 2 groups,
the following data was noted
Conclusions There is no difference in hospitalization rates
between patients on first generation antipsychotic depots as com-
pared to second generation antipsychotic depots.