Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  639 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 639 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S583–S644

S635

EV0711

The relationship between

responsiveness to social and monetary

rewards and ADHD symptoms

B. Sutcubasi Kaya

1 ,

, B. Metin

1

, F.Z. Krzan

1

, N. Tarhan

2

, C. Tas

1

1

Uskudar University, psychology, Istanbul, Turkey

2

Uskudar University, Psychiatry, Istanbul, Turkey

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Alterations in reward processing are frequently

reported in ADHD. One important factor that affects reward

processing is the quality of reward, as social andmonetary, rewards

are processed by different neural networks. However, effect of

reward type on reward processing in ADHD was not extensively

studied.

Aims

We aimed to explore the effect of reward type (i.e., social

or monetary) on different phases of reward processing and also to

test the hypothesis that ADHD symptoms may be associated with

a problem in processing of social rewards.

Methods

We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during

a spatial attention paradigm in which cues heralded availabil-

ity and type of the upcoming reward and feedbacks informed

about the reward earned. Thirty-nine (19 males and 20 females)

healthy individuals (age range: 19–27) participated in the study.

ADHD symptoms were measured using ADHD self-report scale

(ASRS).

Results

The feedback related potentials, namely feedback related

negativity (FRN), P200 and P300 amplitudes, were larger for social

rewards compared to monetary rewards

( Fig. 1 ).

There was a con-

sistent negative correlation between the hyperactivity subscale of

ASRS and almost all feedback related ERPs. ERP amplitudes after

social rewards were smaller for individuals with more hyperactiv-

ity.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that hypo responsiveness to

social rewards may be associated with hyperactivity. However, the

results have to be confirmed with clinical populations.

Fig. 1

FRN amplitudes.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1041

EV0712

The differential effect of event rate on

pupil dilation patterns suggests effort

dysregulation problems in ADHD

B. Metin

1 ,

, E. Sonuga-Barke

2

, J.R. Wiersema

2

, H. Roeyers

2

,

S. Vermeir

2

1

Uskudar University, Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey

2

Ghent University, Psychology, Ghent, Belgium

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The state regulation model postulates that ADHD

performance difficulties result from failures to regulate activation

states in response to changing environmental conditions – produc-

ing poor performance under sub-optimal conditions. Behavioral

and electrophysiological studies involving the manipulation of

event rate (ER) lend support to this idea.

Aim

In this preliminary study, we extended this investigation by

comparing pupil dilation, an established marker of cognitive effort

allocation, in individuals with ADHD, and controls, in response to

varying ERs on a simple cognitive task.

Methods

Nineteen children with ADHD (age range: 8–14 years)

and 21 controls (age range: 10–16 years) completed a target detec-

tion task under three different ERs (1300, 4000, and 8000 msec).

Pupil dilation was monitored using an eye-tracker.

Results

Our results show that for controls, pupil dilation to tar-

gets varied as a function of ER according to a “U” function –with fast

and slow ERs inducing greater phasic dilation than the moderate

ER. However, for children with ADHD the relationship was linear

with dilation increasing as ER decreased.

Conclusions

The results provide the first pupillary evidence sug-

gestive of effort allocation dysregulation in ADHD especially under

fast event rate conditions. Future studies should explore interven-

tions to overcome effort allocation problems.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1042

EV0713

Interrelationships between cortisol,

cognition and dementia: A review of

the literature and new own findings

S. Ouanes

, P. Julius

University Hospital of Lausanne, Department of Psychiatry,

Lausanne, Switzerland

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Cortisol exerts effects on the brain via two different

receptors, producing complex and sometimes opposite effects on

the brain structures involvedwith the different cognitive functions.

Objective

To scrutinize the interrelationships between cortisol,

cognition and dementia.

Methods

Review of the literature and new own findings.

Results

Animal and clinical studies showed an association

between increased cortisol and poorer overall cognitive perfor-

mance, declarative memory, language, processing speed, executive

functioning, spatialmemory, aswell as socialmemory. High cortisol

may exhibit neurotoxic effects on the hippocampus, and exacer-

bate oxidative injury and amyloid peptide toxicity. Increased

CSF cortisol levels have been found in subjects with dementia and

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

compared to control subjects with normal cognition. In MCI due

to AD, high CSF cortisol may also predict a more rapid cognitive

decline. Higher cortisol levels have been also observed in delirium.

Increased cortisol levels interact with inflammatory mediators,

neurotransmitters, and growth factors, andmaymediate the effects

of depression, stressful life events, and personality traits, sleep dis-

turbances, and cardiovascular risk factor on cognitive performance

and cognitive decline.