European Psychiatry - Volume 41 - April 2017

335 / 916

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S303–S364 S331
2 Lausanne university hospital, old age psychiatry, Tunis, Tunisia
3 Razi hospital, psychiatry outpatient unit, Tunis, Tunisia
∗ Corresponding author.
Introduction Akathisia is probably the most common and one of
the most distressing of the movement disorders associated with
antipsychotic drugs. Little is known about its prevalence and its
risk factors in real-world psychotic and bipolar patients to date.
Objectives The main objective of this study was to determine the
prevalence of akathisia and to determine the risk factors and the
treatments associated with it in a sample of Tunisian patients with
schizophrenia, schizoaffective or bipolar disorder.
Methods Seventy-four patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffec-
tive or bipolar disorder were included and assessedwith a validated
scale: the Barnes Akathisia scale (BAS). Ongoing psychotropic treat-
ments were recorded.
Results The global prevalence of akathisia (as defined by a
score ≥ 2 on the global akathisia subscale of the BAS) was 20.5%.
Akathisia was significantly more common in patients with schizo-
phrenia or schizoaffective disorder than in patients with Bipolar
disorder (27.5% vs 9.4%; P = 0.049). However, the prevalence of
akathisia did not differ according to sex, age, the illness dura-
tion, the presence of a comorbid anxiety disorder, the number of
antipsychotics used, the type of the used antipsychotic (first vs
second-generation), the antipsychotic chlorpromazine-equivalent
total dosage, the use of benzodiazepines or anticholinergics, or the
reported drug compliance.
Conclusions Akathisia seems to be more common in some
psychiatric disorders than in others such as schizophrenia or schi-
zoaffective disorder. Longitudinal studies would be required to
draw any firm conclusions concerning the factors involved in the
emergence of akathisia.
Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
EW0658
The relationship between parenting
stress and parenting styles with
coping strategies in adolescents: The
moderating roles of emotional
regulation and mindfulness
M. Kheradmand ∗, S. Ghahari
1 Islamic Azad university, master of clinical psychology, Tonekabon,
Iran
2 Iran university of medical sciences, mental health, Tehran, Iran
∗ Corresponding author.
Object The aim of this study was to investigate the moderating
role of emotional regulation and mindfulness in the relationship
between parenting stress and styles with coping strategies.
Methods Themethod in this study is correlation. Statistical popu-
lation consists of all adolescents in 2016, from among which 400
individuals were selected in a multi-stage cluster samplingmethod
from different areas of Tehran and completed Adolescent Coping
Scales, Parenting Stress Index, Baumrind parenting styles Inven-
tory, emotional regulation checklist of kids and adolescents and of
kids’ and adolescents’ mindfulness measurement. The data were
analyzed using multivariate regression and Pearson correlation in
SPSS-22.
Finding The results showed themindfulness and emotional regu-
lation play amoderating role in the relationship between parenting
stress and coping strategies (P > 0.0001) as well as the relationship
between parenting styles and coping strategies (P> 0.0001).
Conclusion Despite the poor parenting stress and parenting
styles, if the adolescents have emotion regulation and mindfulness
skills can reduce the negative effects of inappropriate parenting.
Keywords Parenting stress; Coping strategies; Parenting style;
Emotional regulation; Mindfulness
Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
EW0659
From Hampstead to Norwich: Ritual
violence or coaching?
R. Kurz
Cubiks, IPT, Guildford, United Kingdom
Introduction Video-recorded disclosures of two siblings emerged
describing ritual violence activities in a Hampstead “cult” including
human sacrifice murder. The UK court processes judged that the
mother “coached” the children to make false allegations. In paral-
lel, Marie Black, Jason Adams and Michael Roger were found guilty
of child sexual abuse purely based on historical accounts of five
children.
Objectives The presentation outlines two cases that illustrate the
“unbelievable” nature of organized child abuse and what aspects
make court rulings “unsafe”.
Aims The presentation aims to compare the Hampstead where
the videos were watched by 4 million individuals world-wide with
the little that is known about the “Norwich Three” case due to court
reporting restrictions.
Methods Materials posted on websites, books and videos were
reviewed alongside discussionswithwhistle-blowers, relatives and
friends of people involved.
Results The disclosures in theHampstead casewere very extreme
but similar accounts can be found in books by Sara Scott (UK) andDe
Camp (US). Those accused of sexual abuse claim that the children
have been coached by their mother to make these allegations–the
view that the judge adopted. In the Norfolk case, 7 of the 10 defen-
dants were cleared of child sexual abuse allegations but three
individuals were found guilty. It remains unclear what the basis
was for the conviction as the disclosures could have been classed
as the result of “coaching”.
Conclusions Anyone operating in forensic settings should fami-
liarise themselves with the “hall of mirrors” that cases involving
child sexual abuse routinely constitute.
Disclosure of interest The author has not supplied his declaration
of competing interest.
EW0660
Preliminay study for the Italian
validation of the screen for cognitive
impairment in psychiatry (SCIP)
D. Malanchin∗, R. Caruso , M.G. Nanni , L. Grassi , G. Piazza ,
E. Croce , M. Leoni , E. Berretti , L. Negrelli , S. Battista , A. Faccini ,
R. Dall’Olio , S. Costa , E. Recla , G. Rossi , C. Colla
University of Ferrara, clinical psychiatry, department of biomedical
and specialty surgical sciences, Ferrara, Italy
∗ Corresponding author.
Introduction The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry
(SCIP) is a brief, accessible scale designed for detecting cognitive
deficits in psychiatric disorders.
Objectives The objective of this study is to test the SCIP’s validity
as a cognitive test by comparisonwith standard neuropsychological
scale using the Pearson’s correlation.
Aims Test the convergent and discriminant validity of the SCIP
within the Italian SCIP validation project.
Methods Patients between 18 and 65 years who are in a stable
phase of the disease, diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective