Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  337 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 337 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S303–S364

S333

D. Piacentino

1 , 2 ,

, G .

Giupponi

2 , I. M

aniscalco

2 , S. H

olzer

3 ,

M. Pompili

1 , P. G

irardi

1 , A. C

onca

2 , 4

1

Nesmos department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory

organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and

psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy

2

Psychiatric department, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of

South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

3

Specialistic outpatient service for ADHD in adults, sanitary agency

of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

4

Provincial service of developmental psychiatry and psychotherapy,

sanitary agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

Corresponding author at: Corresponding author.

Introduction

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

affects 5–6% of adults. Methylphenidate challenge is used to test

functions such as concentration. Therapeutic drug monitoring

(TDM) identifies optimal drug ranges in plasma.

Objectives/Aims

We aimed to: assess the clinical impact of the

drug challenge in adults with ADHD; analyze the relationship with

the drug plasma levels after the challenge; identify predictors of

the challenge’s clinical impact.

Methods

In 2015–2016, we recruited 45 consecutive adult

DSM-5 ADHD outpatients (mean age

±

SD = 35.3

±

2.1 years;

females = 64.4%) at the Bolzano hospital department of psychia-

try. Before and after administration of methylphenidate 10mg, we

measured concentration, impulsivity, tension, and general well-

being with a VAS and an interview. After two hours, TDM was

performed. Deltas were calculated for pre-/post-challenge mea-

sures. Correlations were measured with Pearson’s r/point-biserial

coefficient. A generalized linear mixed model estimated the size of

association between tension/general well-being improvement and

patient characteristics.

Results

After the challenge, the mean improvement

±

SD was

24

±

22 for concentration, 17

±

23 for impulsivity, 21

±

28 for ten-

sion, 16

±

24 for general well-being. The mean TDM

±

SD was

4.6

±

0.5 ng/mL. A negative correlation between TDM, tension

(

P

= 0.009), and general well-being (

P

= 0.028) after the challenge

emerged: higher drug plasma levels relate to less tension and

greater general well-being. At theGLMMthemainpredictor for ten-

sion/general well-being improvement was psychopharmacological

treatment (

P

= 0.011/

P

= 0.05, respectively). Older age and difficult

tasks prevented improvement.

Conclusions

Methylphenidate challenge had a positive effect on

all patients’ performance. TDM values were lower than literature

ones, although the latter are usually obtained after the administra-

tion of methylphenidate 20 mg.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.277

EW0665

Sensitivity and specificity of the

Italian version of the bipolar spectrum

diagnostic scale. Different scores in

distinct populations with unipolar

depression

D. Piacentino

1 , 2 ,

, P. Girardi

3

, K.G.D. Md

3 , 4

, L. Sanna

2

,

I. Pacchiarotti

3

, D.P. Rossi

1 , 4

, N. Girardi

5

, S. Rizzato

1

,

G. Callovini

1

, G. Sani

1

, G. Manfredi

1

, R. Brugnoli

1

, M. Pompili

1

,

R. Pies

6

, S.N. Ghaemi

7

, L. Mazzarini

1

1

NESMOS department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory

organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and

psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy

2

Psychiatric division, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of South

Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

3

Bipolar disorders programme, institute of clinical neuroscience,

hospital Clinic, university of Barcelona, Idibaps, Cibersam, Barcelona,

Espa˜na

4

Neurobehavioral clinical research section, social and behavioral

research branch, National human genome research institute (NHGRI),

National institutes of health (NIH), 20892 Bethesda, Maryland, USA

5

Department of neurology and psychiatry, Sapienza–university of

Roma, policlinico umberto I, Rome, Italy

6

Department of psychiatry, SUNY upstate medical university,

Syracuse, NY, USA

7

Mood disorder program and psychopharmacology consultation

clinic, Tufts medical center, Tufts university school of medicine,

Boston, MA, USA

Corresponding author.

Introduction

To date, the proposition of recurrence as a subclini-

cal bipolar disorder feature has not received adequate testing.

Objectives/Aims

We used the Italian version of the bipolar spec-

trum diagnostic scale (BSDS), a self-rated questionnaire of bipolar

risk, in a sample of patients with mood disorders to test its specifi-

city and sensitivity in identifying cases and discriminating between

high risk for bipolar disorder major depressive patients (HRU) and

low risk (LRU) adopting as a high recurrence cut-off five or more

lifetime major depressive episodes.

Methods

We included 115 patients with DSM-5 bipolar disorder

(69 type I, 41 type II, and 5 NOS) and 58 with major depressive

disorder (29 HRU and 29 LRU, based on the recurrence criterion).

Patients filled-out the Italian version of the BSDS, which is currently

undergoing a validation process.

Results

The BSDS, adopting a threshold of 14, had 84% sensitivity

and 76% specificity. HRU, as predicted, scored on the BSDS inter-

mediate between LRU and bipolar disorder. Clinical characteristics

of HRU were more similar to bipolar disorder than to LRU; HRU,

like bipolar disorder patients, had more lifetime hospitalizations,

higher suicidal ideation and attempt numbers, and higher rates of

family history of suicide.

Conclusions

The BSDS showed satisfactory sensitivity and sensi-

tivity. Splitting the unipolar sample into HRU and LRU, on the basis

of the at least 5 lifetimemajor depressive episodes criterion, yielded

distinct unipolar subpopulations that differ on outcome measures

and BSDS scores.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.279

EW0666

Aggression and violence towards

healthcare workers in a psychiatric

service in Italy. A retrospective

questionnaire-based survey

D. Piacentino

, a , b , S . M

oser

a , S. T

osato

c , C. B

onetto

c , A. C

onca

a , d ,

J.V. Bizzarri

a

a

Psychiatric department, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of

South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

b

NESMOS department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory

organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and

psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy

c

Department of public health and community medicine, section of

psychiatry, university of Verona, Verona, Italy

d

Provincial service of developmental psychiatry and psychotherapy,

sanitary agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Violence at work is a major concern in health-

care services. Prevention programs have been implemented, albeit

being scarce in Italy.

Objectives or Aims

The Bolzano psychiatric department adopted a

de-escalation model developed by the Institut-für-Professionelles-

Deeskalations-Management (ProDeMa

®

). It includes evaluation,

prevention, and practical training aimed at preventing/reducing

patients’ aggressive behavior toward healthcare workers.