data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39547/3954718aa54adec6b27e289bea6b57f9224c94f0" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29e4d/29e4dccecf9ec842a174136097fbcdc7a0d90b1a" alt="Page Background"
25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S303–S364
S333
D. Piacentino
1 , 2 ,∗
, G .Giupponi
2 , I. Maniscalco
2 , S. Holzer
3 ,M. Pompili
1 , P. Girardi
1 , A. Conca
2 , 41
Nesmos department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory
organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and
psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy
2
Psychiatric department, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of
South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
3
Specialistic outpatient service for ADHD in adults, sanitary agency
of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
4
Provincial service of developmental psychiatry and psychotherapy,
sanitary agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
∗
Corresponding author at: Corresponding author.
Introduction
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
affects 5–6% of adults. Methylphenidate challenge is used to test
functions such as concentration. Therapeutic drug monitoring
(TDM) identifies optimal drug ranges in plasma.
Objectives/Aims
We aimed to: assess the clinical impact of the
drug challenge in adults with ADHD; analyze the relationship with
the drug plasma levels after the challenge; identify predictors of
the challenge’s clinical impact.
Methods
In 2015–2016, we recruited 45 consecutive adult
DSM-5 ADHD outpatients (mean age
±
SD = 35.3
±
2.1 years;
females = 64.4%) at the Bolzano hospital department of psychia-
try. Before and after administration of methylphenidate 10mg, we
measured concentration, impulsivity, tension, and general well-
being with a VAS and an interview. After two hours, TDM was
performed. Deltas were calculated for pre-/post-challenge mea-
sures. Correlations were measured with Pearson’s r/point-biserial
coefficient. A generalized linear mixed model estimated the size of
association between tension/general well-being improvement and
patient characteristics.
Results
After the challenge, the mean improvement
±
SD was
24
±
22 for concentration, 17
±
23 for impulsivity, 21
±
28 for ten-
sion, 16
±
24 for general well-being. The mean TDM
±
SD was
4.6
±
0.5 ng/mL. A negative correlation between TDM, tension
(
P
= 0.009), and general well-being (
P
= 0.028) after the challenge
emerged: higher drug plasma levels relate to less tension and
greater general well-being. At theGLMMthemainpredictor for ten-
sion/general well-being improvement was psychopharmacological
treatment (
P
= 0.011/
P
= 0.05, respectively). Older age and difficult
tasks prevented improvement.
Conclusions
Methylphenidate challenge had a positive effect on
all patients’ performance. TDM values were lower than literature
ones, although the latter are usually obtained after the administra-
tion of methylphenidate 20 mg.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.277EW0665
Sensitivity and specificity of the
Italian version of the bipolar spectrum
diagnostic scale. Different scores in
distinct populations with unipolar
depression
D. Piacentino
1 , 2 ,∗
, P. Girardi
3, K.G.D. Md
3 , 4, L. Sanna
2,
I. Pacchiarotti
3, D.P. Rossi
1 , 4, N. Girardi
5, S. Rizzato
1,
G. Callovini
1, G. Sani
1, G. Manfredi
1, R. Brugnoli
1, M. Pompili
1,
R. Pies
6, S.N. Ghaemi
7, L. Mazzarini
11
NESMOS department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory
organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and
psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy
2
Psychiatric division, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of South
Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
3
Bipolar disorders programme, institute of clinical neuroscience,
hospital Clinic, university of Barcelona, Idibaps, Cibersam, Barcelona,
Espa˜na
4
Neurobehavioral clinical research section, social and behavioral
research branch, National human genome research institute (NHGRI),
National institutes of health (NIH), 20892 Bethesda, Maryland, USA
5
Department of neurology and psychiatry, Sapienza–university of
Roma, policlinico umberto I, Rome, Italy
6
Department of psychiatry, SUNY upstate medical university,
Syracuse, NY, USA
7
Mood disorder program and psychopharmacology consultation
clinic, Tufts medical center, Tufts university school of medicine,
Boston, MA, USA
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
To date, the proposition of recurrence as a subclini-
cal bipolar disorder feature has not received adequate testing.
Objectives/Aims
We used the Italian version of the bipolar spec-
trum diagnostic scale (BSDS), a self-rated questionnaire of bipolar
risk, in a sample of patients with mood disorders to test its specifi-
city and sensitivity in identifying cases and discriminating between
high risk for bipolar disorder major depressive patients (HRU) and
low risk (LRU) adopting as a high recurrence cut-off five or more
lifetime major depressive episodes.
Methods
We included 115 patients with DSM-5 bipolar disorder
(69 type I, 41 type II, and 5 NOS) and 58 with major depressive
disorder (29 HRU and 29 LRU, based on the recurrence criterion).
Patients filled-out the Italian version of the BSDS, which is currently
undergoing a validation process.
Results
The BSDS, adopting a threshold of 14, had 84% sensitivity
and 76% specificity. HRU, as predicted, scored on the BSDS inter-
mediate between LRU and bipolar disorder. Clinical characteristics
of HRU were more similar to bipolar disorder than to LRU; HRU,
like bipolar disorder patients, had more lifetime hospitalizations,
higher suicidal ideation and attempt numbers, and higher rates of
family history of suicide.
Conclusions
The BSDS showed satisfactory sensitivity and sensi-
tivity. Splitting the unipolar sample into HRU and LRU, on the basis
of the at least 5 lifetimemajor depressive episodes criterion, yielded
distinct unipolar subpopulations that differ on outcome measures
and BSDS scores.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.279EW0666
Aggression and violence towards
healthcare workers in a psychiatric
service in Italy. A retrospective
questionnaire-based survey
D. Piacentino
∗
, a , b , S . Moser
a , S. Tosato
c , C. Bonetto
c , A. Conca
a , d ,J.V. Bizzarri
aa
Psychiatric department, San Maurizio hospital, sanitary agency of
South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
b
NESMOS department (neurosciences, mental health, and sensory
organs), Sapienza university of Rome, school of medicine and
psychology, Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy
c
Department of public health and community medicine, section of
psychiatry, university of Verona, Verona, Italy
d
Provincial service of developmental psychiatry and psychotherapy,
sanitary agency of South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
Violence at work is a major concern in health-
care services. Prevention programs have been implemented, albeit
being scarce in Italy.
Objectives or Aims
The Bolzano psychiatric department adopted a
de-escalation model developed by the Institut-für-Professionelles-
Deeskalations-Management (ProDeMa
®
). It includes evaluation,
prevention, and practical training aimed at preventing/reducing
patients’ aggressive behavior toward healthcare workers.