Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  672 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 672 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S668

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S645–S709

EV0808

Invisible effects of chemotherapy

D. Brandão

1 , 4

, T. Assunc¸ ão

2 , 4

, H. Almeida

3 , 4 ,

1

Interna Psiquiatria ULSAM, Departamento de Psiquiatria e Saúde

Mental da ULSAM, Braga, Portugal

2

IPO-Porto, Porto, Portugal

3

Hospital Magalhães Lemos, B, Porto, Portugal

4

University of Porto, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and

Mental Health Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Chemotherapy is an essential component in the

treatment and alleviation of oncological diseases. To your appli-

cation are associated, as well as systemic effects, cognitive

impairment in patients. These changes have received increasing

attention due to the impact on quality of life of cancer survivors.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the current evidence

on the association between chemotherapy and cognitive impair-

ment in cancer patients, especially in the areas affected cognitive

function, possible mechanisms of action and consequences on

the quality of life of these patients and the importance of

identifying strategies intervention in order to minimize these

effects.

Methods

We conducted a literature review from literature arti-

cles addressing this topic with use of databases: Medline and

Pubmed. The following keywords were used: “chemobrain”, “cog-

nitive dysfunction”, “chemotherapy”.

Results

Although some states have not found differences, sev-

eral studies have shown that chemotherapy has implications

cognitively. Underlying etiology remains unknown, and proposed

several mechanisms to explain these changes: neurotoxicity,

microvascular damage and inflamamatory response. Cognitive

impairment has significant implications in the daily life of

patients both personally, socially and labour. The therapeutic

approach focuses on the patient and family education, cop-

ing strategies, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive behavioural

therapy.

Conclusions

It is vital to educate patients about the possibility of

cognitive change as effect of chemotherapy as well as health pro-

fessionals in the early identification of these changes. It is essential

developing specific intervention strategies to improve the quality

of life of the oncologic patient during and after treatment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1138

EV0809

The study and comparison of the

severity of coping strategies and

defense mechanisms in prostate

cancer patients, healthy individuals

and patients with similar localization

oncology

J. Gardanova

, I. Abdullin , A. Chernov , D. Khritinin

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University,

Psychotherapy, Moscow, Russia

Corresponding author.

This project deals with the problem of emotional response to

their disease in prostate cancer patients compared with healthy

people and patients with similar localization of oncology dis-

eases. As a result, it was found that in patients with prostate

cancer pronounced such defense mechanisms as repression,

denial and reaction formation, which may lead to psychosomatic

disease. The coping strategies of the system in patients with

prostate cancer is most pronounced, such a mechanism as a

“distancing”. The results may contribute to the creation of a

specific psychological rehabilitation for this group of patients the

program.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1139

EV0810

Bruxism as a consequence of

chemotherapy?

G. Da Ponte

1 ,

, J. R

ato

2 , C. P

into

2 , M.

Lobo

1 , S. O

uakinin

3

1

Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Psychiatry and Mental Health,

Barreiro, Portugal

2

Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Oncology, Barreiro, Portugal

3

Medical School of Lisbon University, University Clinic of Psychiatry

and Medical Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Bruxism is a syndrome with uncertain etiology

but with proposed factors: psychosocial, peripheral and cen-

tral. Treatment is also controversial and one of the options

focuses in GABA theory and regularization of ion channels.

Xelox (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) and bevacizumad is indicated for

metastatic colorectal cancer, being oxaliplatin the most neuro-

toxic agent (acute syndrome and/or a chronic sensory neuropathy).

Acute neurotoxicity is very frequent and it is a sensory and/or a

motor toxicity (as tongue tingling or jaw spams). The proposed

pathogenesis – neuronal hyperexcitability due to alterations of

voltage-gated ion channels – is supported by mechanism of action

of some treatments.

Objectives and Aims

Review different causes of bruxism.

Methods

Description of a clinical case.

Results

This is a story of 76-years-old man in treatment for

metastatic colon cancer that developed toxicity: nauseas (treated

with haloperidol), bruxismand gingival atrophy. Hewas referred to

psycho-oncology by involuntary movements of mouth and trunk.

The patient complained of sadness, anhedonia and insomnia since

recurrence of cancer and related the movements with CT. At obser-

vation he was anxious, tearfulness and agitated. He was treated for

a depressive episode, but the doubt remained about involuntary

movements: haloperidol was a confounding factor for oxaliplatin

acute neurotoxicity, also aggravated by psychic and peripheral fac-

tors.

Conclusions

The authors believe that bruxism is linked to CT in

a very complex relation that includes psychic, peripheral and cen-

tral factors. Psychiatrists need to keep attention to the patient as a

whole, not being seduced by easy answers like psychosocial factors.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1140

EV0811

I was not so

M.J. Gordillo Monta˜no

1 ,

, S. Ramos Perdigues

1

,

E. Guillén Guillén

2

, O. Lopez Berastegui

3

, M. Guisado Rico

1

,

S.V. Boned Torres

1

, M. De Amuedo Rincon

1

, C. Merino del Villar

1

,

S. Latorre

1

1

Hospital Can Misses, Psychiatry, Eivissa, Spain

2

Hospital Clinic, Psycho-oncology, Barcelona, Spain

3

Hospital Can Misses, Medicine, Eivissa, Spain

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The frontal lobes are the brain structures of latest

development and evolution in the human brain. It is considered

that the frontal lobes represent the “executive center of the brain”.

The frontal tumors represent 16% of all supratentorial tumors.

Symptoms are easily confused as psychiatric rather than neuro-

logical.