Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  744 / 916 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 744 / 916 Next Page
Page Background

S740

25th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 41S (2017) S710–S771

be rude, even if only they are only blunt (

P

= 0.006). We found no

differences in empathy between first year and last year MS.

Conclusions

In our sample of Italian students, we have not found

MS to be more or less empathetic than other university students,

but there are some peculiar differences in empathy that make them

better suited to the chosen course of study. Moreover, we found no

differences between the different years of medical school.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1361

EV1032

Owning the brand of psychiatry

A. Peters

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists,

OPCEO, Melbourne, Australia

In Australia and New Zealand, conversations around mental health

are playing out in the public space with increasing frequency. Men-

tal health promotion campaigns and organizations are embraced by

mainstream and other forms of media, and supported by govern-

ment. Whilst public knowledge of mental illness is increasing, the

profile of psychiatrists as leaders and medical experts in mental ill-

ness is a more difficult brand to sell. With a somewhat tarnished

history behind us, the modern evidence-based practice of psychia-

try is not always at the forefront of public impression. Furthermore,

in Australia, more than half of the population (56%) is unaware that

psychiatrists have undertaken medical training as a doctor. This

presentation will outline Royal Australian and New Zealand college

of psychiatrists (RANZCP) action to improve community informa-

tion about psychiatry, psychiatrists and treatment experiences.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his/her decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1362

EV1033

Prejudice towards people with mental

illness

J. Radovi´c

, I. Roncevic-Grzeta , J. Rebic

Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Psychiatric Clinic, KBC

Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

Corresponding author.

This paper reports the results of a medical research that measured

prejudice and attitudes towardsmentally ill people and towards the

mental illness. Three groups of respondents were studied: medical

students, psychology students and the general population. Medical

students and psychology students represented a population that

is educated in regards to mental illness, and the general popula-

tion was not trained so much about mental illness. The hypothesis

was that the respondents who have been working with mentally ill

people and had lots of knowledge about mental illnesses were the

personswith less prejudice towards peoplewithmental illness. The

main objective of research was to examine the differences in prej-

udice and attitudes between respondents who had experience and

knowledge related to mental illness and people with mental illness

compared to those without such knowledge and experience. Test-

ing was conducted using an anonymous online survey consisting

of thirteen questions. The research confirmed the hypothesis and

it could be an incentive for education aimed at specific groups.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1363

EV1034

The importance of early detection of

child neurodevelopment in primary

care in Colombia

A.M. Romero Otalvaro

, M. Munoz-Argel

Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Psicologia, Monteria, Colombia

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The systematic assessment of child development for

the first 30months of age is essential in the monitoring of health

outcomes; this requires to have a structured protocol to systemati-

cally observe the milestones that have to be achieved at each stage

of child development, and prevent deficiencies related to risk fac-

tors, reduce and prevent special needs arising from a deficit of the

neurodevelopment.

Objective

Describe the results of the evaluation of early detec-

tion of neurodevelopment problems in subjects from 0–30months

of age who assist to child developmental centers in municipali-

ties located in the Colombian Caribbean region; the main need for

intervention was characterized with different neurodevelopment

problems.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was developed. Childs from

0–30months of age who attended to the child development cen-

ters were tested. Exclusion criteria were not stipulated. The ASQ-3

and a demographic survey (Graffar’s survey) were administrated,

in order to correlate the social level and the overall results.

Results

The study included 750 boy/girl. The maturational devel-

opment for each age group was determined, an analysis of each

neurodevelopment area was conducted and the results were cor-

related with the demographic survey.

Conclusions

High levels of suspicion of possible neurodevelop-

ment problems and the referral to diagnostic evaluation were

observed for access to appropriate treatments. Early detection is

highlighted as a tool in primary care that optimizes health sector

resources and act in the appropriate periods of plasticity of child

development.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1364

EV1035

Psychiatric treatment-associated

stigmatization as viewed through eyes

of rural health clinic patients

D. Sendler

1 ,

, A. Markiewicz

2

1

University of Lublin Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and

Sexual Consultation Clinic, Lublin, Poland

2

Private practice, Community mental health, Lublin, Poland

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Having amental disease is frequently a stigmatizing

experience for patients. We know little about urban inhabitants

who travel to rural health clinics to receive mental treatment.

Objectives

Recruit and interview urban-based psychiatric

patients who, to avoid stigmatization; travel to rural community

clinics with the intention of receiving treatment.

Methods

Study included participants (

n

= 32) who exchanged

treatment in government subsidized city clinics for rural commu-

nity centers. Qualitative interviews lasting thirty minutes were

recorded and transcribed for content analysis. MAXQDA, version

12, was used to annotate transcripts with topic specific nodes, fol-

lowed by cluster theme and trend analysis.

Results

Trend analysis yielded three areas of concern for

subsidized urban psychiatry: cost/insurance, lack of staff profes-

sionalism, and family-driven ostracism. Seven respondents cited

cost as the main factor, influencing the choice of rural-based care

over city clinic. Patients with stable income, but without insur-

ance (

n

= 14), felt unwelcome in city clinics as their ability to pay